Total Commodity Programs in Benson County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 484
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Benson County, North Dakota totaled $12,034,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jeff Hagen | Esmond, ND 58332 | $97,064 |
22 | Sabbes Farm & Ranch | Maddock, ND 58348 | $94,591 |
23 | James Harold Fragodt | York, ND 58386 | $93,192 |
24 | Thomas Howard Schmid | Oberon, ND 58357 | $91,570 |
25 | Bill Michael Streifel | Oberon, ND 58357 | $90,722 |
26 | Herman & Sons Inc | Minnewaukan, ND 58351 | $88,348 |
27 | Mark Williams | Maddock, ND 58348 | $84,972 |
28 | Timothy Joe Tuchscherer | York, ND 58386 | $82,678 |
29 | Bremer Bank ** | Devils Lake, ND 58301 | $81,524 |
30 | James C Hausmann | Churchs Ferry, ND 58325 | $80,022 |
31 | David Wolfe | Esmond, ND 58332 | $78,296 |
32 | Rice Land & Cattle Co | Maddock, ND 58348 | $77,833 |
33 | Lowell Baustad | Rugby, ND 58368 | $77,465 |
34 | James Fossen | Minnewaukan, ND 58351 | $77,246 |
35 | Randall Joeseph Pfeifer | Minnewaukan, ND 58351 | $76,570 |
36 | Brenda Lee Pfeifer | Minnewaukan, ND 58351 | $76,570 |
37 | Mark Stephen Kallenbach | Maddock, ND 58348 | $76,421 |
38 | Edward Jacob Schmid Jr | Minnewaukan, ND 58351 | $76,159 |
39 | Richard James Slater | Maddock, ND 58348 | $75,862 |
40 | Richard A Kurtz Jr | Saint Michael, ND 58370 | $75,620 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”