Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) in Billings County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 131
Recipients of Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) from farms in Billings County, North Dakota totaled $1,622,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Livestock Assistance Program (ELAP) 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Kevin Fugere | Belfield, ND 58622 | $76,572 |
2 | Brandon Michael Richard | Belfield, ND 58622 | $63,058 |
3 | Virginia A Hager | Mobridge, SD 57601 | $58,713 |
4 | David Joseph Rodakowski | Fairfield, ND 58627 | $55,929 |
5 | Jay Obrigewitch | Beach, ND 58621 | $48,884 |
6 | Dwayne Shypkoski | Belfield, ND 58622 | $43,397 |
7 | Shane Talkington | Belfield, ND 58622 | $42,120 |
8 | Jerry Anheluk | Belfield, ND 58622 | $38,916 |
9 | Kathleen Kay Richard | Belfield, ND 58622 | $34,395 |
10 | Loren Newton Bock | Belfield, ND 58622 | $33,918 |
11 | Edwin Egly | Belfield, ND 58622 | $31,806 |
12 | Cody Reis | Fairfield, ND 58627 | $30,996 |
13 | David Reis | Fairfield, ND 58627 | $30,105 |
14 | Bill David Richard | Belfield, ND 58622 | $29,073 |
15 | Byron Michael Richard | Belfield, ND 58622 | $28,663 |
16 | Coy Obrigewitch | Beach, ND 58621 | $28,524 |
17 | Kris Allen Swenson | Belfield, ND 58622 | $28,149 |
18 | Allan Richard | Belfield, ND 58622 | $28,101 |
19 | Joey Vesey | Fairfield, ND 58627 | $28,059 |
20 | Jonathan Roy Klym | Belfield, ND 58622 | $27,216 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>