Farm Subsidy information
Burke County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Burke County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 691
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Burke County, North Dakota totaled $30,889,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Josh Watterud | Columbus, ND 58727 | $204,531 |
22 | Ryan L Aufforth | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $202,693 |
23 | Bryan Foster Ankenbauer | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $200,922 |
24 | Jay Hass | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $196,966 |
25 | Jon Michael Sagness | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $194,969 |
26 | Justin Lee Iverson | Columbus, ND 58727 | $194,778 |
27 | Marshall Wade Hermanson | Stanley, ND 58784 | $189,062 |
28 | Busch Farms Inc | Columbus, ND 58727 | $187,807 |
29 | First International Bank & Trust ** | Elgin, ND 58533 | $182,403 |
30 | Jady Dwain Parkinson | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $176,318 |
31 | Brian Wittman | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $175,154 |
32 | Ronald James St Croix | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $173,977 |
33 | Brian Thomas Rystedt | Battleview, ND 58773 | $171,462 |
34 | West Plains Grain & Cattle Inc | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $169,877 |
35 | Steven Pfeifer Farms LLC | Minot, ND 58701 | $166,397 |
36 | Rockin J Grain And Cattle LLC | Noonan, ND 58765 | $165,080 |
37 | Brodal Farms Ltd | Columbus, ND 58727 | $161,726 |
38 | Tyler Grubb | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $160,484 |
39 | Kayo Grubb | Powers Lake, ND 58773 | $160,467 |
40 | Kyle Darren Melby | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $160,154 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”