Total Commodity Programs in Burke County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,068
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Burke County, North Dakota totaled $156,515,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | T And M Farm Co | Portal, ND 58772 | $2,588,915 |
2 | Prairiedale Farms Corp | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $2,138,818 |
3 | Michael Steven Ely | Columbus, ND 58727 | $1,973,749 |
4 | Tlcb Farm | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $1,875,973 |
5 | Jeff Bohl | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $1,816,713 |
6 | Craig Johnston Farms Inc | Columbus, ND 58727 | $1,790,590 |
7 | Kent Horntvedt | Columbus, ND 58727 | $1,638,468 |
8 | Dennis Bauer | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $1,619,474 |
9 | Loren Peterson | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $1,595,263 |
10 | Jay Hass | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $1,564,286 |
11 | Ronald James St Croix | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $1,559,133 |
12 | Kristian Sorum | Flaxton, ND 58737 | $1,525,775 |
13 | Kerry Strom | Portal, ND 58772 | $1,519,202 |
14 | Bryan Foster Ankenbauer | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $1,506,043 |
15 | Jacobson Farms Inc | Bowbells, ND 58721 | $1,461,052 |
16 | Dale Maury Ganskop | Flaxton, ND 58737 | $1,451,143 |
17 | J A K Farm Co | Kenmare, ND 58746 | $1,401,648 |
18 | Leelyn Gale Hermanson | Lignite, ND 58752 | $1,329,785 |
19 | Brodal Farms Ltd | Columbus, ND 58727 | $1,304,956 |
20 | Patrick Michael Ely | Columbus, ND 58727 | $1,176,837 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>