Total Commodity Programs in Cass County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 767
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Cass County, North Dakota totaled $16,669,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Plains Commerce Bank | Hoven, SD 57450 | $62,219 |
42 | Todd Ellison | Mapleton, ND 58059 | $60,848 |
43 | Andrew W Borgen Farms LLC | Georgetown, MN 56546 | $60,823 |
44 | Dale Virgil Torgerson | Kindred, ND 58051 | $60,424 |
45 | Dave Theodore Torgerson | Kindred, ND 58051 | $60,424 |
46 | Dallas Clifford Glasow | Davenport, ND 58021 | $59,914 |
47 | Paula Joan Glasow | Davenport, ND 58021 | $59,914 |
48 | Heidi Jo Odegaard | Hickson, ND 58047 | $59,755 |
49 | Satrom Brothers Inc | Grandin, ND 58038 | $59,443 |
50 | Kevin Heiden | Gardner, ND 58036 | $58,737 |
51 | Dan Flaten | West Fargo, ND 58078 | $58,447 |
52 | Paul Larson | Hunter, ND 58048 | $58,362 |
53 | Choice Financial Group ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $58,303 |
54 | Johnson Farm Enterprises Inc | Page, ND 58064 | $58,192 |
55 | Elm River Credit Union ** | Kindred, ND 58051 | $57,884 |
56 | Lazy J Farms Partnership | Mapleton, ND 58059 | $57,449 |
57 | Tyler Knut Odegaard | Kindred, ND 58051 | $57,268 |
58 | Beth Ann Odegaard | Kindred, ND 58051 | $57,268 |
59 | Jay Zimmerman | Amenia, ND 58004 | $57,238 |
60 | James Daniel Biggers | Buffalo, ND 58011 | $55,926 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”