Farm Subsidy information
Cavalier County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Cavalier County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,487
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Cavalier County, North Dakota totaled $1,271,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Leland George Balsdon | Osnabrock, ND 58269 | $2,375,792 |
22 | Gary Lyn Badding | Hannah, ND 58239 | $2,363,896 |
23 | Joel David Jacobson | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,327,300 |
24 | Rodney Dean Haraseth | Nekoma, ND 58355 | $2,296,825 |
25 | Lynn Jerry Domres | Wales, ND 58281 | $2,250,535 |
26 | Trevor Romfo | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,249,338 |
27 | Troy Romfo | Calvin, ND 58323 | $2,237,119 |
28 | Bryan Cole Kakela | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,223,953 |
29 | William Glenn Wenzel | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,219,716 |
30 | Ray Hamilton Howatt | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,219,470 |
31 | Terrell John Henderson | Calvin, ND 58323 | $2,207,564 |
32 | Keith Joseph Lorenz | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,199,149 |
33 | Kenneth William Forest | Wales, ND 58281 | $2,169,264 |
34 | Gary Leo Beck | Munich, ND 58352 | $2,151,619 |
35 | Shane Heck | Cavalier, ND 58220 | $2,137,459 |
36 | Scott Howatt | Hannah, ND 58239 | $2,116,097 |
37 | Nathan Lee Beck | Munich, ND 58352 | $2,092,635 |
38 | Robert Terry Sanders | Milton, ND 58260 | $2,068,721 |
39 | Terri Lynn Haberstroh | Sarles, ND 58372 | $2,041,267 |
40 | Gary Allen Haraseth | Langdon, ND 58249 | $2,037,654 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”