Production Flexibility Program in Eddy County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 537
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Eddy County, North Dakota totaled $13,404,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | T-t Ranch | Grace City, ND 58445 | $540,148 |
2 | Harold Klein | Des Moines, WA 98198 | $242,754 |
3 | Nancy Klein Est | Des Moines, WA 98198 | $242,753 |
4 | Bradley Weber | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $239,267 |
5 | Monty Joel Schaefer | Carrington, ND 58421 | $215,788 |
6 | Stuart Richter | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $189,905 |
7 | Bruce Kjelgaard | Mchenry, ND 58464 | $187,066 |
8 | Larry John Lura | Carrington, ND 58421 | $173,402 |
9 | Randy James Guler | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $163,914 |
10 | Peter Larson | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $144,585 |
11 | Gregory Chester Rue | Sheyenne, ND 58374 | $141,205 |
12 | Dennis Rimmereid | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $138,417 |
13 | Merle Henry Longnecker | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $138,414 |
14 | Norman Birkeland | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $138,034 |
15 | Gary Lee Weigum | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $137,506 |
16 | Jacob Robert Engels | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $133,412 |
17 | Jeffrey Alan Engels | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $133,408 |
18 | W Arthur Allmaras | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $132,628 |
19 | Phyllis B & Jay Topp | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $128,092 |
20 | Gary Gerard Geisinger | New Rockford, ND 58356 | $123,017 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>