Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) in Golden Valley County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 91
Recipients of Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) from farms in Golden Valley County, North Dakota totaled $876,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Indemnity Program (LIP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Gary Gregory Maus | Golva, ND 58632 | $4,032 |
42 | Dale Stedman Estate | Beach, ND 58621 | $3,840 |
43 | Richard L Bostyan | Golva, ND 58632 | $3,579 |
44 | Clark Beach | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $3,575 |
45 | Pete Wilson | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $3,570 |
46 | Joe Richard Barbour | Wibaux, MT 59353 | $3,564 |
47 | Francis Connolly | Keene, ND 58847 | $3,345 |
48 | Kyle P Sperry Jr | Beach, ND 58621 | $3,225 |
49 | Meilon Wayne Hildebrant | Beach, ND 58621 | $3,192 |
50 | Rusty Makelky | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $3,132 |
51 | Seth Tanner Tescher | Beach, ND 58621 | $3,132 |
52 | Lorraine R Schwenke | Zortman, MT 59546 | $3,120 |
53 | Charles E Schwenke | Zortman, MT 59546 | $3,120 |
54 | Bradley Clabe Marshall | Terry, MT 59349 | $2,684 |
55 | Gordon J Ueckert | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,535 |
56 | Donald J Hall Revocable Trust-don | Solen, ND 58570 | $2,468 |
57 | Edvegen M Abraham | Beach, ND 58621 | $2,423 |
58 | David Michael Clarin | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,250 |
59 | Ty Vanhorn | Sentinel Butte, ND 58654 | $2,237 |
60 | Troy Tescher | Beach, ND 58621 | $2,235 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”