Conservation Reserve Program in Grant County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 809
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Grant County, North Dakota totaled $33,012,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Harold Gaugler | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $163,128 |
42 | Kilzer Family Limited Partnership | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $156,202 |
43 | Brad Scott | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $153,340 |
44 | Douglas Koepplin | Elgin, ND 58533 | $153,049 |
45 | Joanne Roth | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $151,670 |
46 | Donald D Bachmeier | Mandan, ND 58554 | $149,829 |
47 | Leonard Roth | Washburn, ND 58577 | $149,008 |
48 | Salt Creek Farms Lllp | Eagle, CO 81631 | $148,022 |
49 | Arnold Wagy | Mandan, ND 58554 | $147,806 |
50 | Bank Of Glen Ullin ** | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $146,566 |
51 | Anthony Ehrmantrout Estate | Elgin, ND 58533 | $144,496 |
52 | Cedar Valley Ranch Llp | Morristown, SD 57645 | $139,185 |
53 | John Miller Jr | Mandan, ND 58554 | $133,570 |
54 | Ernest Schafer | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $132,572 |
55 | Roger D Roth | Mandan, ND 58554 | $129,093 |
56 | Merlin Leithold | Elgin, ND 58533 | $129,059 |
57 | Virgil Arthur Stern | Elgin, ND 58533 | $128,527 |
58 | Doyle Duane Heupel | Elgin, ND 58533 | $128,462 |
59 | Malcolm Schulz | Elgin, ND 58533 | $124,934 |
60 | Robert Christensen | Mesa, AZ 85207 | $123,247 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”