Total Commodity Programs in Grant County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 485
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Grant County, North Dakota totaled $10,534,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Justin Andrew Eikamp | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $81,998 |
22 | Rebecca Ann Eikamp | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $81,998 |
23 | Robert Hintz | Flasher, ND 58535 | $74,849 |
24 | Brian Lynn Schatz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $73,067 |
25 | Amber Schatz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $73,043 |
26 | Jay Wynne Moser | Morristown, SD 57645 | $72,878 |
27 | Saul Jared Maier | Elgin, ND 58533 | $72,766 |
28 | Matthew Niederman | Morristown, SD 57645 | $72,226 |
29 | James Dalton Ackerman | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $70,198 |
30 | Haas Brothers | Elgin, ND 58533 | $70,009 |
31 | Kevin Vandenburg | Flasher, ND 58535 | $69,575 |
32 | Jeffrey Allen Vandenburg | Flasher, ND 58535 | $68,422 |
33 | Tyler Edward Woodbury | Carson, ND 58529 | $68,318 |
34 | Pete Edwin Koepplin Jr | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $66,721 |
35 | Duane J Frank | Shields, ND 58569 | $64,095 |
36 | Lincoln Roth | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $63,292 |
37 | First Community Credit Union ** | Jamestown, ND 58402 | $59,141 |
38 | Blaine Duane Ottmar | Elgin, ND 58533 | $58,929 |
39 | Chester Reinhold Dietz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $58,837 |
40 | Glenda Dietz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $58,774 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”