Market Facilitation Program (MFP) in Griggs County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 272
Recipients of Market Facilitation Program (MFP) from farms in Griggs County, North Dakota totaled $18,001,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Facilitation Program (MFP) 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Haugen Farms Jv | Hannaford, ND 58448 | $739,287 |
2 | Iverson Farms Partnership | Binford, ND 58416 | $554,460 |
3 | Lausch Farms Jv | Valley City, ND 58072 | $481,034 |
4 | Bank Forward ** | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $425,095 |
5 | Brian Mark Hoffman | Sutton, ND 58484 | $339,537 |
6 | Scott Saxberg | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $326,819 |
7 | David Bryan Heinz | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $310,422 |
8 | S&c Precision Farms | Hannaford, ND 58448 | $299,857 |
9 | Scott Lee Liljenquist | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $276,829 |
10 | Jayson Bruce Gronneberg | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $270,612 |
11 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $269,620 |
12 | Timothy T Soma | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $262,763 |
13 | Brian Fiebiger | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $254,600 |
14 | Sherri Fiebiger | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $254,600 |
15 | Jason Haugen | Dazey, ND 58429 | $249,506 |
16 | Jonathan David Erickson | Cooperstown, ND 58425 | $223,490 |
17 | Timothy Weber | Binford, ND 58416 | $223,024 |
18 | Bt Farms | Wimbledon, ND 58492 | $221,936 |
19 | Goplen Farm Inc | Hannaford, ND 58448 | $219,417 |
20 | Claire Leon Eberhardt | Aneta, ND 58212 | $215,040 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>