Commodity Certificates in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 41
Recipients of Commodity Certificates from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $1,396,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Commodity Certificates 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jimmy Lee Haberstroh | Mott, ND 58646 | $36,120 |
22 | Douglas Lee Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $33,057 |
23 | David Lee Anderson | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $27,428 |
24 | Fred Senn Jr | Mott, ND 58646 | $26,423 |
25 | Dale Ralph Johnson | Bismarck, ND 58503 | $24,065 |
26 | Swindler Family Lllp | Mott, ND 58646 | $23,831 |
27 | Benjamin Schaible Est | Mott, ND 58646 | $22,162 |
28 | Gary Lee Doe | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $20,616 |
29 | Darrel Jay Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $18,831 |
30 | Garret Ray Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $18,096 |
31 | Perry August Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $15,072 |
32 | Starla Deann Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $15,072 |
33 | William - Wm J Eikam Eikamp | Florence, AZ 85132 | $12,006 |
34 | Alan Herner | Mott, ND 58646 | $11,387 |
35 | August Carl Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $8,052 |
36 | Lucille Marie Kirschemann | Mott, ND 58646 | $8,052 |
37 | Gary Leroy Butler | Mott, ND 58646 | $7,075 |
38 | Roger T Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $7,035 |
39 | Connie R Lutz | Regent, ND 58650 | $3,792 |
40 | Richard Albert Lutz | Regent, ND 58650 | $3,792 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”