Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 23
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $101,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Dion Dale Ottmar | Mott, ND 58646 | $36,698 |
2 | Daniel Jay Kilzer | Bentley, ND 58562 | $9,442 |
3 | Casey Lee Hoherz | Bentley, ND 58562 | $8,827 |
4 | Patrick Aaron Kilzer | Hettinger, ND 58639 | $7,193 |
5 | Delmar Arthur Dietz | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $5,352 |
6 | Justin Boersma | Gladstone, ND 58630 | $3,640 |
7 | Milton Mark Klein | Elgin, ND 58533 | $3,621 |
8 | Shane James Magelky | New England, ND 58647 | $3,421 |
9 | Randy Kahl | Mandan, ND 58554 | $3,350 |
10 | Warren Gilbert Doe | New England, ND 58647 | $2,901 |
11 | Rhett L Peterson | Lemmon, SD 57638 | $2,256 |
12 | Michael Cary Greff | Mott, ND 58646 | $2,007 |
13 | Melvin Otto Frieze | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,995 |
14 | James Dalton Ackerman | New Leipzig, ND 58562 | $1,837 |
15 | Evans Bros | New England, ND 58647 | $1,595 |
16 | Victor F Meier | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,320 |
17 | Valentine Curtis Jahner | Mott, ND 58646 | $1,305 |
18 | Jocelyn Wiesinger | Bentley, ND 58562 | $1,252 |
19 | Robert Wiesinger | Bentley, ND 58562 | $1,252 |
20 | Sandra Hoffman | Mott, ND 58646 | $868 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>