Farm Subsidy information
Hettinger County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 769
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $40,141,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jonathan & Robin Stang-jv | Regent, ND 58650 | $698,459 |
| 2 | Commercial Bank Of Mott ** | Mott, ND 58646 | $624,437 |
| 3 | Shane & Stacey Hertz-jv | Mott, ND 58646 | $512,940 |
| 4 | Tia Marie Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $384,657 |
| 5 | Gary Dean Honeyman | Regent, ND 58650 | $384,657 |
| 6 | Kelly Herberholz | New England, ND 58647 | $350,581 |
| 7 | Amy Herberholz | New England, ND 58647 | $345,856 |
| 8 | Farm Credit Services Of Nd ** | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $343,313 |
| 9 | Sheri Ann Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $295,337 |
| 10 | Jonathan Chris Wert | New England, ND 58647 | $293,487 |
| 11 | Nathan Charles Vanlishout | Mott, ND 58646 | $288,190 |
| 12 | Janelle Susan Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $275,931 |
| 13 | Douglas Lee Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $275,928 |
| 14 | Jennifer Jo Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $265,582 |
| 15 | Garret Ray Swindler | Mott, ND 58646 | $265,581 |
| 16 | Brent Martin Roll | Mott, ND 58646 | $244,646 |
| 17 | Mary Joanne Roll | Mott, ND 58646 | $238,704 |
| 18 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $236,619 |
| 19 | Blickensderfer Farms | Mott, ND 58646 | $230,965 |
| 20 | Jerald N Rafferty | New England, ND 58647 | $230,042 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf