Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Hettinger County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 68
Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Hettinger County, North Dakota totaled $236,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Environmental Quality Incentives Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Alvin H Kibbel | Mott, ND 58646 | $15,716 |
2 | Marc P Wolf | New England, ND 58647 | $14,671 |
3 | James E Binstock | Regent, ND 58650 | $13,020 |
4 | Richard Albert Lutz | Regent, ND 58650 | $11,268 |
5 | John Wolff | Mandan, ND 58554 | $10,778 |
6 | Russell Dean Jordan | Mott, ND 58646 | $10,268 |
7 | Jeremy Fischer | New England, ND 58647 | $10,145 |
8 | Mark Allen Koller | New England, ND 58647 | $10,079 |
9 | Gary Schaefer | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $9,598 |
10 | Leslie Kirschmann | Regent, ND 58650 | $7,445 |
11 | David Glaser | Mott, ND 58646 | $7,404 |
12 | Jason W Dorner | New England, ND 58647 | $7,160 |
13 | Douglas Lee Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $6,061 |
14 | Janelle Susan Fitterer | New England, ND 58647 | $6,058 |
15 | Del Lynn Eisenbarth | New England, ND 58647 | $5,307 |
16 | Keaton Schaefer | New England, ND 58647 | $4,934 |
17 | Gary A & Meridean Sprecher-jv | Mott, ND 58646 | $4,846 |
18 | Dale Allen Zich | Mott, ND 58646 | $4,777 |
19 | Shannon Ray Rafferty | Regent, ND 58650 | $4,541 |
20 | Gary F Friedt | Mott, ND 58646 | $4,340 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>