Conservation Reserve Program in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 694
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $19,954,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Ardith A Lippert | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $159,761 |
22 | Clarence Lippert | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $159,758 |
23 | Louis Schmidt | Mandan, ND 58554 | $153,559 |
24 | James Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $152,994 |
25 | Keith Adam Fleck | Solen, ND 58570 | $151,202 |
26 | M Curtis Feland | Almont, ND 58520 | $147,194 |
27 | Marshall Feland | Mandan, ND 58554 | $147,193 |
28 | Wayne E Carter | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $146,220 |
29 | Louse Creek Hunt Club Llp | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $142,769 |
30 | Terrance Duppong | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $139,936 |
31 | Eugene B Weinhardt | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $121,238 |
32 | Wilfred George Berger | Flasher, ND 58535 | $120,141 |
33 | Bernice Kinnischtzke | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $113,846 |
34 | William R Steckler Jr | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $112,279 |
35 | Fabian Fitterer | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $109,606 |
36 | Bank Of North Dakota-sep | Bismarck, ND 58506 | $108,662 |
37 | Kevin Virgil Kilen | New Salem, ND 58563 | $108,438 |
38 | Hoerauf Family Trust | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $105,312 |
39 | Gordon L Kroh | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $104,589 |
40 | Peltz Revocable Living Trust | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $104,495 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”