Total Disaster Programs in Morton County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,403
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $57,673,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Leslie Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $302,012 |
22 | David Wanner | Hebron, ND 58638 | $300,332 |
23 | Lance Eugene Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $298,213 |
24 | Roeder Honey Farms Inc | Dixon, NE 68732 | $295,249 |
25 | Kenneth L Duppong | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $294,469 |
26 | Mike J Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $287,682 |
27 | Craig Michael Horst | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $285,953 |
28 | Roger Schantz | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $282,122 |
29 | Leonard Joseph Heinert | Solen, ND 58570 | $281,018 |
30 | Dale Craig Heinle | Hebron, ND 58638 | $279,216 |
31 | Steckler Ranch Inc | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $277,701 |
32 | Douglas Raymond Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $276,979 |
33 | Mark Anthony Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $271,823 |
34 | Terrance James Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $264,901 |
35 | Ronald Lee Schantz | Hebron, ND 58638 | $260,502 |
36 | Farm Services Agency ** | Washington, DC 20250 | $249,852 |
37 | Marshall Feland | Mandan, ND 58554 | $248,776 |
38 | Orval Paul Schlenvogt | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $248,447 |
39 | August Joseph Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $244,576 |
40 | Bradley Edward Thiel | Almont, ND 58520 | $243,537 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”