Total Disaster Programs in Morton County, North Dakota, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 604
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Morton County, North Dakota totaled $27,438,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Sweet River Company LLC | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $729,520 |
2 | Lance Miller | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $470,521 |
3 | Doll Farm Enterprises | New Salem, ND 58563 | $445,453 |
4 | Bradley Allen Fisher | Solen, ND 58570 | $382,699 |
5 | Mary Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $319,151 |
6 | Peltz Brothers | New Salem, ND 58563 | $315,176 |
7 | Wilbert Lee Fisher Jr | Mandan, ND 58554 | $309,524 |
8 | Kenneth A Schmidt | Solen, ND 58570 | $280,916 |
9 | Kevin Michael Opp | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $262,323 |
10 | Renee Ione Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $259,554 |
11 | Bryan Russell Hoesel | New Salem, ND 58563 | $253,041 |
12 | Jacqueline Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $250,429 |
13 | James Carlton Schaaf | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $250,000 |
14 | Larry Laubner | Mandan, ND 58554 | $238,864 |
15 | Ellingson Ranch Inc | St Anthony, ND 58566 | $238,367 |
16 | Stephen Wilbert Berger | Saint Anthony, ND 58566 | $234,285 |
17 | Leslie Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $229,503 |
18 | Lance Eugene Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $226,510 |
19 | Hogerville Dairy Llp | New Salem, ND 58563 | $209,703 |
20 | Gerald Meuchel | Hebron, ND 58638 | $196,344 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>