Farm Subsidy information
Oliver County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Oliver County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 992
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oliver County, North Dakota totaled $156,643,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Michael Jay Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $425,412 |
62 | Steven H Martin | Washburn, ND 58577 | $414,326 |
63 | Kasper Jerome Kraft | New Salem, ND 58563 | $408,575 |
64 | Carlyle Robert Hillstrom | Hensler, ND 58530 | $404,397 |
65 | Michael Wayne Gerving | Glen Ullin, ND 58631 | $401,074 |
66 | William Fredrick Breimeier | New Salem, ND 58563 | $400,155 |
67 | Anthony Berger | Stanton, ND 58571 | $399,460 |
68 | Doll Farm Enterprises | New Salem, ND 58563 | $394,319 |
69 | Glen Clarence Lennick | New Salem, ND 58563 | $388,417 |
70 | Jerry J Weber | Center, ND 58530 | $377,806 |
71 | Christohper James Keller | New Salem, ND 58563 | $361,312 |
72 | Marshall Karges | Stanton, ND 58571 | $356,876 |
73 | Carter Jerome Berg | Center, ND 58530 | $342,010 |
74 | John Arthur Smith | Beulah, ND 58523 | $331,968 |
75 | Terrance James Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $331,117 |
76 | Travis Lennick | New Salem, ND 58563 | $330,408 |
77 | Jeffrey Joseph Schutt | Beulah, ND 58523 | $326,715 |
78 | James Folk | Center, ND 58530 | $319,785 |
79 | John Dixon | Mandan, ND 58554 | $307,499 |
80 | Darrell John Schulte | Center, ND 58530 | $305,309 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”