Farm Subsidy information
Oliver County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Oliver County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 992
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oliver County, North Dakota totaled $156,643,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Price Farm And Ranch | Stanton, ND 58571 | $930,746 |
22 | Patrick James Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $923,848 |
23 | Eugene Paul Yantzer | Center, ND 58530 | $915,277 |
24 | Darell Herman | Beulah, ND 58523 | $896,987 |
25 | Chad Shawn Tweeten | Washburn, ND 58577 | $882,300 |
26 | Justin William Retterath | Washburn, ND 58577 | $873,304 |
27 | Kathleen Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $825,814 |
28 | Doug Price | Center, ND 58530 | $751,677 |
29 | Lonnie Henke | Hannover, ND 58563 | $737,474 |
30 | Clark Price | Hensler, ND 58530 | $719,823 |
31 | Jamie Terrence Mosbrucker | New Salem, ND 58563 | $717,277 |
32 | Gary Lee Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $680,607 |
33 | Donald Streifel | Washburn, ND 58577 | $678,325 |
34 | Wade Staigle | Center, ND 58530 | $662,655 |
35 | David Bruce Berg | Stanton, ND 58571 | $661,529 |
36 | Dwight Huber | New Salem, ND 58563 | $658,246 |
37 | Clark Price | Washburn, ND 58577 | $627,509 |
38 | Micky L Doll | New Salem, ND 58563 | $619,582 |
39 | Nathan Lowell Henke | Center, ND 58530 | $611,280 |
40 | Price Brothers Ranch | Washburn, ND 58577 | $610,583 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”