Farm Subsidy information
Ransom County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Ransom County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,102
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $563,390,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Centennial Farm | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $1,883,763 |
22 | Double R Farms | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,827,358 |
23 | Roland K Reinke | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,709,090 |
24 | Qual Dairy Inc | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,706,942 |
25 | Royce Dahl | Verona, ND 58490 | $1,685,340 |
26 | Scott Mcdaniel Farms Inc | Englevale, ND 58033 | $1,638,032 |
27 | Mougey Farms | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $1,633,152 |
28 | Ronald George Rotenberger | Milnor, ND 58060 | $1,629,893 |
29 | Bradley Alan Nims | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,627,681 |
30 | Marlene Dahl | Verona, ND 58490 | $1,608,405 |
31 | Kenyon Sorby Inc | Fort Ransom, ND 58033 | $1,583,955 |
32 | Magill Farms Inc | Verona, ND 58490 | $1,571,659 |
33 | Lewis Albert Lyons | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $1,547,393 |
34 | Pfingsten Irrigated Farms Partner | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $1,510,090 |
35 | Duane Galbreath | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $1,488,308 |
36 | Roger Reinke | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,468,364 |
37 | Bc Wagner Farms | Englevale, ND 58033 | $1,444,817 |
38 | Wallace James Carlson Jr | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,428,197 |
39 | Gmg Ranch Llp | Milnor, ND 58060 | $1,386,816 |
40 | Daryl Olson Farm Inc | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,364,479 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”