Farm Subsidy information
Ransom County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Ransom County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,102
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ransom County, North Dakota totaled $563,390,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Mairs Farm Inc | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,362,730 |
42 | John Carlblom | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,332,472 |
43 | Robert Barr | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,315,572 |
44 | Gaylen Dick Farm Inc | Englevale, ND 58033 | $1,309,130 |
45 | Virgil Dagman | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $1,283,493 |
46 | Terry Thompson | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,283,158 |
47 | Matthew Scott Reinke | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,273,845 |
48 | David Dahl Farms Inc | Verona, ND 58490 | $1,272,721 |
49 | Timothy Edward Nord | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $1,271,920 |
50 | Joel Schmitz | Enderlin, ND 58027 | $1,260,907 |
51 | Dwight Krueger | Sheldon, ND 58068 | $1,259,567 |
52 | Jerome Irving Olson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $1,252,648 |
53 | Larry Keith Kenyon | Englevale, ND 58033 | $1,250,878 |
54 | Stephen Patrick Schultz | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,239,476 |
55 | David Larson Farm Inc | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,219,828 |
56 | Brent Strand | Nome, ND 58062 | $1,211,235 |
57 | Thatcher Scott Peterson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $1,192,040 |
58 | Dennis Peterson | Milnor, ND 58060 | $1,175,941 |
59 | Randall Greenley | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,162,995 |
60 | Bergemann Farms Inc | Lisbon, ND 58054 | $1,155,308 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”