Farm Subsidy information

Richland County, North Dakota

Total Subsidies in Richland County, North Dakota, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,278

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Richland County, North Dakota totaled $1,067,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
41Haverland Farms IncWalcott, ND 58077$1,931,368
42Beaver Creek Enterprises IncLeonard, ND 58052$1,905,050
43Michael Gerard KingHankinson, ND 58041$1,876,941
44Jason Edward TheedeFairmount, ND 58030$1,874,392
45Selmer Allen JordheimMcleod, ND 58057$1,871,242
46Vance Gordon GyllandColfax, ND 58018$1,830,549
47Corey James TheedeFairmount, ND 58030$1,822,714
48Russell Casper MauchBarney, ND 58008$1,799,289
49Melissa Amy BraatenKindred, ND 58051$1,779,562
50Muehler Turkey Farms IncHankinson, ND 58041$1,744,896
51Mark BoyerBarney, ND 58008$1,742,923
52Sanbi CoMooreton, ND 58061$1,740,285
53Gilles Bros PartnershipWahpeton, ND 58075$1,737,492
54Gary Dean OsbornFairmount, ND 58030$1,736,811
55Brenda Lynn ProchnowWahpeton, ND 58075$1,731,154
56Larry Steven JohnsonChristine, ND 58015$1,721,592
57Heitkamp Agricultural Farms IncBarney, ND 58008$1,704,851
58Timothy Lee JonesWyndmere, ND 58081$1,704,176
59Thimjon Farms PartnershipWahpeton, ND 58075$1,697,123
60Donald G MummLidgerwood, ND 58053$1,678,477

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag