Direct Payment Program in Sheridan County, North Dakota, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 863
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Sheridan County, North Dakota totaled $25,628,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Steichen Farms Jv | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $564,904 |
2 | Miller Family Farm | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $510,646 |
3 | Faul Jerome/agnes Jv | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $411,582 |
4 | Darin Gene Frueh | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $330,983 |
5 | Duwayne Ronald Tessmann | Bismarck, ND 58501 | $318,356 |
6 | Larry Lee Kaibel | Drake, ND 58736 | $313,394 |
7 | Dean A Ripplinger | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $312,692 |
8 | Myron Henry Dieterle | Kief, ND 58723 | $311,135 |
9 | Troy Henry Stein | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $309,241 |
10 | Brian Paul Thomas | Denhoff, ND 58430 | $308,673 |
11 | Douglas Mark Erdmann | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $292,147 |
12 | Sheldon Leonard Oster | Drake, ND 58736 | $289,596 |
13 | Lee Edward Boehm | Mcclusky, ND 58463 | $283,831 |
14 | Gerald Joel Spear | Drake, ND 58736 | $280,816 |
15 | Garrett Harold Frueh | Martin, ND 58758 | $280,781 |
16 | Ricky James Frueh | Martin, ND 58758 | $280,777 |
17 | Michael Richter | Goodrich, ND 58444 | $267,129 |
18 | Steven Russell Hausauer | Kief, ND 58723 | $263,407 |
19 | Dennis D Weltz | Anamoose, ND 58710 | $262,491 |
20 | Roddy Lynn Schilling | Mercer, ND 58559 | $260,605 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>