Farm Subsidy information
Stark County, North Dakota
Total Subsidies in Stark County, North Dakota, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 494
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Stark County, North Dakota totaled $16,486,000 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fetch Honey & Bees | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $165,380 |
2 | Gene Zent | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $99,425 |
3 | Messer Beaver Creek Ranch Gp | Richardton, ND 58652 | $98,152 |
4 | Fredrick J Berger | Mandan, ND 58554 | $95,414 |
5 | , | $69,395 | |
6 | Rodney Allen Rebel | Richardton, ND 58652 | $61,142 |
7 | Dean Curtis Karsky | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $53,976 |
8 | Lee Ann Cecile Karsky | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $53,026 |
9 | Edna Pauline Privratsky | South Heart, ND 58655 | $50,980 |
10 | Robert Louis Privratsky | South Heart, ND 58655 | $50,976 |
11 | Tyler Jerome Schoch | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $49,903 |
12 | Jared Joseph Schoch | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $49,903 |
13 | Wayne Fred Fisher | Dickinson, ND 58601 | $48,977 |
14 | Tye Jay Schneider | Hebron, ND 58638 | $33,454 |
15 | Leslie Brinster | Belfield, ND 58622 | $31,302 |
16 | Alan Leo Krebs | Gladstone, ND 58630 | $30,063 |
17 | Victor Oukrop | Taylor, ND 58656 | $28,865 |
18 | Brian Mathew Neurohr | Gladstone, ND 58630 | $26,098 |
19 | Michael John Conlon | Richardton, ND 58652 | $25,625 |
20 | David Marion Richard | Belfield, ND 58622 | $24,359 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>