Market Loss Assistance Program in Walsh County, North Dakota, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,147
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Walsh County, North Dakota totaled $26,627,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Midgarden Potato Company | Hoople, ND 58243 | $324,517 |
2 | Swanson Farms | Hoople, ND 58243 | $301,515 |
3 | Mccann Farms | Grafton, ND 58237 | $196,832 |
4 | Gudajtes/john Farm | Minto, ND 58261 | $189,589 |
5 | Wayne Lessard Farms | Grafton, ND 58237 | $173,296 |
6 | Lizakowski Bros | Minto, ND 58261 | $171,557 |
7 | Brubakken Farms | Hoople, ND 58243 | $163,192 |
8 | Lykken Farms | Grafton, ND 58237 | $162,272 |
9 | Hankey Farm | Park River, ND 58270 | $159,001 |
10 | Lone Wolf Farms | Minto, ND 58261 | $149,349 |
11 | Oberg Farms | Hoople, ND 58243 | $147,391 |
12 | Evergreen Farms | Grafton, ND 58237 | $146,692 |
13 | Torkelson Bros Inc | Grafton, ND 58237 | $139,888 |
14 | Feltman Brothers Inc | Minto, ND 58261 | $138,479 |
15 | Paul Suda Farms Inc | Grafton, ND 58237 | $136,540 |
16 | Dennis L Dipple | Grand Forks, ND 58201 | $135,783 |
17 | Czapiewski Brothers Farm | Oslo, MN 56744 | $133,692 |
18 | Steve And Lee Lessard | Grafton, ND 58237 | $131,839 |
19 | John F Desautel Farming Co | Grafton, ND 58237 | $131,388 |
20 | Alan Collette Farming Assn | Grafton, ND 58237 | $131,178 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>