Farm Subsidy information
Ohio
Total Subsidies in Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 155,175
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Ohio totaled $13,641,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Dechant-notley Farms | Oberlin, OH 44074 | $3,589,907 |
42 | Comp Dairy Farm Ltd | Dorset, OH 44032 | $3,586,146 |
43 | Linder Farms | Edison, OH 43320 | $3,570,850 |
44 | Carraher Ag Co | Mowrystown, OH 45155 | $3,556,054 |
45 | Mike Farm Enterprises | Dayton, OH 45458 | $3,548,253 |
46 | Cronkleton Farms | West Mansfield, OH 43358 | $3,427,007 |
47 | Mcguire Ag | Urbana, OH 43078 | $3,392,134 |
48 | Rufenacht Farms | Archbold, OH 43502 | $3,386,774 |
49 | Fenstermaker Farms Inc | Leipsic, OH 45856 | $3,336,453 |
50 | Deerfield Farms | Deerfield, OH 44411 | $3,334,143 |
51 | Ralph Bros | Morral, OH 43337 | $3,298,519 |
52 | Dawson Farms Inc | Delaware, OH 43015 | $3,255,675 |
53 | Islercrest Farms Inc | Prospect, OH 43342 | $3,246,379 |
54 | Four County Grain | Bellevue, OH 44811 | $3,243,019 |
55 | Shipley Farms | Newark, OH 43055 | $3,187,045 |
56 | Heintz Farms Partnership | Belle Center, OH 43310 | $3,187,012 |
57 | Emswiler Farms | Pataskala, OH 43062 | $3,185,872 |
58 | C H Mccarthy Corporation | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $3,145,114 |
59 | Shoup Brothers Limited | Orrville, OH 44667 | $3,136,947 |
60 | Dull Homestead Inc | Brookville, OH 45309 | $3,123,205 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”