Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 2,516

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Ohio totaled $14,407,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
61Southland Centennial Farm IncNew Bremen, OH 45869$27,793
62Sunset Valley Dairy Farm LtdStone Creek, OH 43840$27,372
63Paul SchwabPort Washington, OH 43837$27,320
64Douglas FedakWakeman, OH 44889$27,317
65Baucher Fms IncCelina, OH 45822$27,160
66Kevin L MillerWest Unity, OH 43570$27,000
67Dan YoungUnion City, OH 45390$26,629
68Niese FarmsCrestline, OH 44827$26,170
69Maurice RitchieLewisville, OH 43754$26,070
70David J NollSomerset, OH 43783$25,850
71Keith WoodLong Bottom, OH 45743$25,835
72Elmer L HomanCelina, OH 45822$25,623
73Leeper Farms IncMarysville, OH 43040$25,538
74Kenneth L EtheringtonWest Mansfield, OH 43358$25,472
75Kevin E FisherBotkins, OH 45306$24,913
76Tom HuntNew Madison, OH 45346$24,829
77Lane Hill Farm Limited PtrMinster, OH 45865$24,654
78Paul Ryan JrHillsboro, OH 45133$24,412
79David J HuelskampWapakoneta, OH 45895$23,708
80John E ClarkBeach City, OH 44608$23,625

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag