Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 in Fayette County, Ohio, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 48
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $91,849 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 1 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Robert Ervin Miller | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $740 |
22 | Jason A Bihl | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $690 |
23 | Nicholas M Anderson | Mechanicsburg, OH 43044 | $684 |
24 | Charles E Kunka | New Holland, OH 43145 | $578 |
25 | David Kunka | New Holland, OH 43145 | $578 |
26 | Jeffrey W Cockerill II | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $553 |
27 | Dan S Schuler | Greenfield, OH 45123 | $550 |
28 | Bruce A Bennett Jr | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $531 |
29 | John R Cook II | Bloomingburg, OH 43106 | $528 |
30 | Wayne E Arnold | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $517 |
31 | Ritenour Farms LLC | Jeffersonville, OH 43128 | $499 |
32 | Madeline V Wolfe | New Holland, OH 43145 | $451 |
33 | Agri Business Finance ** | St Paris, OH 43072 | $443 |
34 | Gary Seaburn | South Solon, OH 43153 | $371 |
35 | Bruce C Chilcote | Washington Court Hou, OH 43160 | $343 |
36 | Jared Baudendistel | Jamestown, OH 45335 | $325 |
37 | Randy Miller | New Holland, OH 43145 | $318 |
38 | Nicholas Miller | New Holland, OH 43145 | $273 |
39 | Nathan Miller | New Holland, OH 43145 | $273 |
40 | Richard David Wood | Sabina, OH 45169 | $262 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”