Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Fayette County, Ohio, 2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 325

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $3,757,000 in in 2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
2021
21Mark Drew AllenWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$36,213
22Montcrest FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$34,857
23Garth HynesWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$34,236
24Johnny T PendletonNew Holland, OH 43145$33,959
25Kirk L StuckeyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$32,438
26Cummings Farms LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$31,483
27Keller Ag LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$30,889
28Ted William WaddleWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$30,455
29Cody W KirkpatrickNew Holland, OH 43145$29,611
30Craig E CockerillWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$29,594
31Robert Owen LanmanSabina, OH 45169$29,395
32Waddle Family Farms Operating LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$29,012
33Miller & Son Farms LLCWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$28,496
34Christina Carol GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$26,727
35Amy L GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$26,727
36Jeffrey Dan SchlichterWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$26,037
37Stuckey Enterprises LLCLeesburg, OH 45135$25,344
38Ake Holding Co LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$24,829
39Matthew KnechtJeffersonville, OH 43128$24,691
40Conn Farms Ag IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$24,617

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag