Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 624

Recipients of Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $28,025,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Agricultural Risk Coverage (ARC) Program
1995-2023
21Blanton Farms PartnershipMiddletown, OH 45042$212,295
22Douglas D MillerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$207,632
23Anderson FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$204,552
24Robert Owen LanmanSabina, OH 45169$199,585
25David MartinJeffersonville, OH 43128$198,755
26Johnny T PendletonNew Holland, OH 43145$198,711
27David MillerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$178,474
28Jeffrey Dan SchlichterWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$176,095
29Miller & Son PtrWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$171,885
30Gregory R MillerBloomingburg, OH 43106$169,180
31Rodney MillerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$168,008
32Mark Drew AllenWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$166,141
33Larry CarmanWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$164,083
34Miller Farms General PartnershipWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$163,817
35Dsf IncWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$160,364
36Carson Family Farms IncWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$157,798
37Todd GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$157,505
38Timothy A SchaeferBloomingburg, OH 43106$155,914
39Gary Ward CockerillLeesburg, OH 45135$154,527
40Jack R WaddleWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$152,993

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag