Farm Subsidy information

Fayette County, Ohio

Total Subsidies in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 2,037

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $317,605,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
41Daniel R RobinsonMount Sterling, OH 43143$967,807
42Miller & Son PtrWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$967,191
43Wayne HidyBloomingburg, OH 43106$949,953
44Anderson FarmsWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$947,458
45Kirk L StuckeyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$911,578
46Daniel KelleyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$908,501
47Barry E MeyerBloomingburg, OH 43106$890,258
48Mount Sterling Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$874,812
49Lawrence L HaglerBloomingburg, OH 43106$869,674
50James J HaglerBloomingburg, OH 43106$869,378
51John H PetersonWshngtn Ct Hs, OH 43160$865,099
52Scott G JenksJeffersonville, OH 43128$853,749
53Christopher T GarlandWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$851,412
54David MillerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$845,805
55Joe GarlandWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$843,756
56James S ClawsonJeffersonville, OH 43128$842,696
57David CockerillWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$839,672
58Timothy A SchaeferBloomingburg, OH 43106$833,233
59Robert L PetersonSabina, OH 45169$831,431
60Cavalier Polled HerefordsBellbrook, OH 45305$828,728

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag