Farm Subsidy information

Fayette County, Ohio

Total Subsidies in Fayette County, Ohio, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,037

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Fayette County, Ohio totaled $317,605,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
21Larry CarmanWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,292,459
22Todd GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,278,198
23Gregory Gene GustinWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,265,657
24Ollie SponcilGreenfield, OH 45123$1,155,532
25Johnny T PendletonNew Holland, OH 43145$1,153,365
26Gregory R MillerBloomingburg, OH 43106$1,147,243
27Norman ThomasWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,141,995
28Andrew Thomas BeattyGreenfield, OH 45123$1,112,791
29Jack R WaddleWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,107,467
30Dill Family Farms IncSabina, OH 45169$1,084,479
31Mccoppin Bros FarmsWashington Ch, OH 43160$1,081,252
32Rodney MillerWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,053,234
33Ricketts Farm IncJeffersonville, OH 43128$1,009,808
34Kenneth W ArnoldWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$1,009,801
35Blanton Farms PartnershipMiddletown, OH 45042$1,001,606
36Twin Oak Dairy LLCSouth Solon, OH 43153$988,462
37Craig E CockerillWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$985,562
38James C PerrillSabina, OH 45169$982,211
39Estate Of Ronald L MccoyWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$981,952
40Marvin D CarrWashington Court Hou, OH 43160$981,257

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag