Market Gains in Wyandot County, Ohio, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 66
Recipients of Market Gains from farms in Wyandot County, Ohio totaled $1,173,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Gains 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | David M Frey | Harpster, OH 43323 | $18,465 |
22 | Gregory L Tong | Carey, OH 43316 | $17,140 |
23 | Craig Swihart | Syracuse, IN 46567 | $13,658 |
24 | Scott L Stansbery | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $11,554 |
25 | Bils Family Farms Ltd | Nevada, OH 44849 | $11,223 |
26 | Patricia Althouse Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $10,018 |
27 | Richard Althouse Rev Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $10,018 |
28 | Bigler Brothers Partnership | Sycamore, OH 44882 | $9,003 |
29 | Wave M Reber Estate Trust | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $8,270 |
30 | Paul Searfoss | Kenton, OH 43326 | $7,584 |
31 | James Searfoss | Forest, OH 45843 | $7,584 |
32 | Iles Family Farms LLC | Harpster, OH 43323 | $7,488 |
33 | James D Lehnhart | Waynesboro, VA 22980 | $7,055 |
34 | Hubert Sheaffer | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $6,844 |
35 | Kevin P Boes | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $6,044 |
36 | Patricia A Kin | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $5,104 |
37 | Brent Frobose | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $4,546 |
38 | Ronald E Iles | Harpster, OH 43323 | $4,193 |
39 | Paul M Bushong | Mount Blanchard, OH 45867 | $3,836 |
40 | Hubert Sheaffer Inc | Upper Sandusky, OH 43351 | $3,646 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”