Conservation Reserve Program in Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 22,287
Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in Oklahoma totaled $883,017,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Conservation Reserve Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Russell Family Partnership | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $878,291 |
42 | M F Farms Limited Partnership | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $874,449 |
43 | Williams Farms Of Gould LLC | Gould, OK 73544 | $868,470 |
44 | James Sides | Durham, OK 73642 | $867,967 |
45 | Dennis Mcdowell | Frisco, TX 75033 | $863,897 |
46 | John Howard Morris | Balko, OK 73931 | $851,836 |
47 | Vangie Farms | Crescent, OK 73028 | $850,772 |
48 | Williams Agri Ltd | Keyes, OK 73947 | $847,088 |
49 | Elkhart Farms Inc | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $841,929 |
50 | Anna Sue Stanley Estate | Rosston, OK 73855 | $832,048 |
51 | Dayton G & Gloria J Cline Living Trust | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $831,368 |
52 | Claude Adams Rev Living Trust | Hooker, OK 73945 | $824,356 |
53 | Joe D Flanagan | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $818,473 |
54 | Edward K Allen | Boise City, OK 73933 | $816,104 |
55 | Jack & Verdeen L Slatten Family L | Turpin, OK 73950 | $810,065 |
56 | Kenneth T Powell 2007 Revocable Trust | Edmond, OK 73012 | $804,851 |
57 | Aubrey Foreman Farms Inc | Perry, OK 73077 | $801,156 |
58 | Glenn Brewer Living Trust | Elkhart, KS 67950 | $783,611 |
59 | Irvin Clark Farms Inc | Texhoma, OK 73949 | $782,651 |
60 | Wilma Chase | Buffalo, OK 73834 | $781,618 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”