Farm Subsidy information
Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 162,996
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Oklahoma totaled $13,140,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $18,381,290 |
2 | Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma ** | Clinton, OK 73601 | $10,303,499 |
3 | Bancfirst ** | Frederick, OK 73542 | $8,477,178 |
4 | Ag Preference Credit Assn Pca ** | Altus, OK 73522 | $8,425,020 |
5 | Beanland Farms | Hollis, OK 73550 | $7,710,320 |
6 | Bank Of Kremlin | Kremlin, OK 73753 | $7,288,714 |
7 | Stockmans Bank ** | Gould, OK 73544 | $6,916,325 |
8 | Hitch Farms Partnership | Guymon, OK 73942 | $6,627,024 |
9 | Bates Bros & Sons | Altus, OK 73521 | $6,571,630 |
10 | Radcliff Farms | Forgan, OK 73938 | $6,567,846 |
11 | Wooderson Farms | Blackwell, OK 74631 | $6,521,567 |
12 | K & S Partnership | Hollis, OK 73550 | $6,147,098 |
13 | Duane Stevens | Anadarko, OK 73005 | $5,982,779 |
14 | Long Family Farms Prtnrshp | Optima, OK 73945 | $5,754,171 |
15 | J & J Farms | Forgan, OK 73938 | $5,721,524 |
16 | Bill & Karen Dill-joint Venture | Hollis, OK 73550 | $5,690,428 |
17 | Worrell Farms Partnership | Altus, OK 73521 | $5,665,289 |
18 | H & H Farms | Newkirk, OK 74647 | $5,208,794 |
19 | Hardzog Farms | Elgin, OK 73538 | $5,030,315 |
20 | Williams Farms Of Gould LLC | Gould, OK 73544 | $4,776,868 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>