Total Disaster Programs in Cimarron County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,360
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Cimarron County, Oklahoma totaled $101,840,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Hinds Ag Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $783,252 |
22 | Nathan John Crabtree | Boise City, OK 73933 | $762,159 |
23 | R Bradly James | Boise City, OK 73933 | $742,662 |
24 | Joey Meister | Boise City, OK 73933 | $742,620 |
25 | Everett Leroy Durham | Keyes, OK 73947 | $729,360 |
26 | Minor Shad Imler | Boise City, OK 73933 | $724,700 |
27 | Thomas T James | Felt, OK 73937 | $698,768 |
28 | B J Cattle Co Inc | Boise City, OK 73933 | $695,831 |
29 | Celebrity Feeders | Felt, OK 73937 | $693,758 |
30 | Bourk Farms Inc | Boise City, OK 73933 | $680,531 |
31 | West Edge Inc | Amarillo, TX 79118 | $675,463 |
32 | James M Robinson | Boise City, OK 73933 | $658,361 |
33 | T Williams Ltd | Keyes, OK 73947 | $646,948 |
34 | Windriver Cattle LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $641,229 |
35 | Shields Cattle Company | Boise City, OK 73933 | $624,350 |
36 | Balenseifen Land & Cattle Inc | Keyes, OK 73947 | $605,580 |
37 | W Roger Crabtree 2007 Trust | Boise City, OK 73933 | $597,006 |
38 | John Verner Smith | Boise City, OK 73933 | $593,521 |
39 | Nye Schumacher Cattle Co LLC | Boise City, OK 73933 | $585,399 |
40 | Arthur Lowane Williamson Revocable Living Trust | Felt, OK 73937 | $574,216 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”