Market Loss Assistance Program in Ellis County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 891
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Ellis County, Oklahoma totaled $6,318,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bob Jones | Gage, OK 73843 | $47,082 |
22 | Williams Farm | Arnett, OK 73832 | $46,318 |
23 | Dale Milton | Fargo, OK 73840 | $43,434 |
24 | John W Haffner Trust | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $40,549 |
25 | Randy Sherrill | Arnett, OK 73832 | $40,170 |
26 | Carl D Ohair Revocable Living Tr | Beaver, OK 73932 | $39,913 |
27 | Verlan W Harrell | Oklahoma City, OK 73102 | $39,711 |
28 | Clinton Stahlman | Gage, OK 73843 | $38,986 |
29 | W & W Cattle Co | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $38,544 |
30 | Holloway Partnership | Arnett, OK 73832 | $38,204 |
31 | Clarence Davis And Sons | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $37,134 |
32 | Loretta Polin Revocable Trust | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $36,730 |
33 | J G Dowler | Arnett, OK 73832 | $36,363 |
34 | Robert Dearing | Arnett, OK 73832 | $35,668 |
35 | Virginia Helfenbein | Purcell, OK 73080 | $35,637 |
36 | Albert W Burgess | Fort Supply, OK 73841 | $34,543 |
37 | Community Jersey Farm Partnership | Gage, OK 73843 | $33,526 |
38 | Milton Smith | Arnett, OK 73832 | $33,017 |
39 | Don E Murphy | May, OK 73851 | $32,687 |
40 | Hurst Joint Revocable Trust | Shattuck, OK 73858 | $32,351 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”