Farm Subsidy information
Grady County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Grady County, Oklahoma, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,018
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Grady County, Oklahoma totaled $7,405,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tim Osborn | Tuttle, OK 73089 | $226,455 |
| 2 | Chickasha Sod & Grass Farm LLC | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $104,163 |
| 3 | Arthur Lee Kell Jr | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $100,656 |
| 4 | John Ezra Osborn | Tuttle, OK 73089 | $99,884 |
| 5 | Jimmie Vickrey | Minco, OK 73059 | $97,668 |
| 6 | Do-be Holstein Farms Co. | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $95,485 |
| 7 | John Paxton | Tuttle, OK 73089 | $87,203 |
| 8 | Turner Farms LLC | Amber, OK 73004 | $80,963 |
| 9 | Brown Dairy LLC | Blanchard, OK 73010 | $79,358 |
| 10 | Timothy O Eaton | Tuttle, OK 73089 | $76,661 |
| 11 | Eugene Corley | Tuttle, OK 73089 | $70,416 |
| 12 | Will Wheeler | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $68,819 |
| 13 | Hillside Dairy LLC | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $68,166 |
| 14 | Toby Farms LLC | Oklahoma City, OK 73179 | $67,087 |
| 15 | Grady Co., Inc. | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $64,406 |
| 16 | Melford L Scott And Margaret L Scott Revocable Tru | Cement, OK 73017 | $62,413 |
| 17 | Jerry A Campbell | Tuttle, OK 73089 | $58,047 |
| 18 | Kelly B Longanacre | Chickasha, OK 73018 | $56,797 |
| 19 | Dale Hardesty | Tuttle, OK 73089 | $56,399 |
| 20 | James D Crawford | Pocasset, OK 73079 | $56,367 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf