Farm Subsidy information
Jackson County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Jackson County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 3,359
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Jackson County, Oklahoma totaled $655,889,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Worrell & Worrell Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,458,362 |
62 | Justin C & Amy L Abernathy Jt Vt | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,448,188 |
63 | Worrell Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,446,985 |
64 | Robert Sam Howard | Headrick, OK 73549 | $1,445,217 |
65 | Timothy Byron Springs Estate | Eldorado, OK 73537 | $1,441,582 |
66 | Dwain Lee Dean Living Tr - A Rvoc Tr | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,433,668 |
67 | John Phillip Olson | Olustee, OK 73560 | $1,415,279 |
68 | Joe Kelly Living Trust | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,408,087 |
69 | Bradley Farms Inc | Olustee, OK 73560 | $1,407,959 |
70 | Scott Pryor | Olustee, OK 73560 | $1,375,354 |
71 | Noble L Ballard Md | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,370,784 |
72 | Tommy Joe Beach | Elmer, OK 73539 | $1,368,009 |
73 | R & S Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,362,975 |
74 | Tim J Miller | Headrick, OK 73549 | $1,360,700 |
75 | V88 Farms LLC | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,323,983 |
76 | Ed & Rob Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,302,853 |
77 | Kellie D Muller | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,282,975 |
78 | Michael Bonewitz | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,281,502 |
79 | Sunshine Farms Inc | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,280,714 |
80 | Brent S Mcleod | Altus, OK 73521 | $1,274,428 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”