Farm Subsidy information
Nowata County, Oklahoma
Total Subsidies in Nowata County, Oklahoma, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,531
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Nowata County, Oklahoma totaled $45,152,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Steve Snelson | Wann, OK 74083 | $272,180 |
22 | James L Ratcliff | Vinita, OK 74301 | $271,656 |
23 | H & H Land And Cattle Company LLC | Vinita, OK 74301 | $262,939 |
24 | Travis Farbro | Fort Gibson, OK 74434 | $258,162 |
25 | Jack P Thomas | Lenapah, OK 74042 | $256,515 |
26 | Auer Cattle Company | Lenapah, OK 74042 | $247,461 |
27 | C Jack Inman | Nowata, OK 74048 | $244,557 |
28 | Adams Wilson Ranch Lllp | Nowata, OK 74048 | $239,321 |
29 | Richard A Hayden | Wann, OK 74083 | $238,487 |
30 | Brian E Little | Wann, OK 74083 | $219,412 |
31 | Roecker Brothers LLC | Dewey, OK 74029 | $218,577 |
32 | Diamond Tail Cattle Company, LLC | Oklahoma City, OK 73131 | $216,692 |
33 | Jorge M Barros | Nowata, OK 74048 | $210,828 |
34 | Stephen Earl Perkins Revocable Trust | Wann, OK 74083 | $210,625 |
35 | Vernon R Oestmann | S Coffeyville, OK 74072 | $203,174 |
36 | Timothy D Forth | S Coffeyville, OK 74072 | $202,128 |
37 | Billy Richard Ridenhour | Delaware, OK 74027 | $200,055 |
38 | Anthony Dean Morris | Delaware, OK 74027 | $196,779 |
39 | Joni K Keeton | S Coffeyville, OK 74072 | $196,631 |
40 | Jack W Powell | S Coffeyville, OK 74072 | $195,665 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”