Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Roger Mills County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 409
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Roger Mills County, Oklahoma totaled $4,158,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Donald Keith York | Durham, OK 73642 | $40,505 |
22 | Mike Switzer | Leedey, OK 73654 | $40,370 |
23 | Kris Black | Crawford, OK 73638 | $39,380 |
24 | H Dewayne Moore | Leedey, OK 73654 | $36,984 |
25 | Greg Bachmann | Durham, OK 73642 | $35,024 |
26 | Malson Cattle Company LLC | Cheyenne, OK 73628 | $32,150 |
27 | Maddux Cattle Co | Strong City, OK 73628 | $30,613 |
28 | James Jimmy Taylor | Cheyenne, OK 73628 | $29,260 |
29 | Bennie Beutler | Elk City, OK 73644 | $29,212 |
30 | Jesse J Newell | Sweetwater, OK 73666 | $29,159 |
31 | Wesley Harden Jr | Hammon, OK 73650 | $27,367 |
32 | Randy Hughes | Hammon, OK 73650 | $25,857 |
33 | Thoral Shaw Jr | Durham, OK 73642 | $25,635 |
34 | Joey Cockrell | Durham, OK 73642 | $24,442 |
35 | Albert H Smith | Durham, OK 73642 | $23,888 |
36 | Karen Harrel | Leedey, OK 73654 | $23,466 |
37 | Y C Fuchs Jr Revocable Trust | Sweetwater, OK 73666 | $23,275 |
38 | Monte E Tucker | Sweetwater, OK 73666 | $23,210 |
39 | Gary D Leddy | Leedey, OK 73654 | $22,275 |
40 | Charles Baker | Cheyenne, OK 73628 | $21,665 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”