Total Commodity Programs in Wagoner County, Oklahoma, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 1,280
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Wagoner County, Oklahoma totaled $34,327,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Mark A White | Coweta, OK 74429 | $1,409,807 |
2 | Robert Cook's Green Acre Sod Farm | Bixby, OK 74008 | $1,328,642 |
3 | Livesay Farms Partnership Dba Livesay Orchards | Porter, OK 74454 | $1,128,451 |
4 | Charles H And Ellen L Coblentz Dairy Farms Inc | Chouteau, OK 74337 | $932,554 |
5 | Hall Ranch Inc | Wagoner, OK 74467 | $912,797 |
6 | Limon Farms Management Inc | Coweta, OK 74429 | $764,933 |
7 | Replogle Farms LLC | Coweta, OK 74429 | $708,817 |
8 | Cooks Farmland Enterprises LLC | Bixby, OK 74008 | $630,787 |
9 | Easton Sod Farms Inc | Bixby, OK 74008 | $568,569 |
10 | Dunkin Families LLC | Tulsa, OK 74135 | $513,558 |
11 | Van R Kunze | Broken Arrow, OK 74011 | $463,077 |
12 | Steve D Butler | Wagoner, OK 74467 | $440,851 |
13 | John William Butler | Wagoner, OK 74467 | $432,225 |
14 | Steven D Van Tuyl | Coweta, OK 74429 | $426,517 |
15 | Combites Farms Inc | Wagoner, OK 74467 | $388,792 |
16 | Kenneth E Replogle | Coweta, OK 74429 | $348,381 |
17 | Double H Farms Inc | Coweta, OK 74429 | $343,939 |
18 | Bruce N Mccollough | Porter, OK 74454 | $304,767 |
19 | Jim C Self | Broken Arrow, OK 74014 | $301,923 |
20 | Marlin E Yoder | Chouteau, OK 74337 | $296,980 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>