Farm Subsidy information
Gilliam County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Gilliam County, Oregon, 2022
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 286
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Gilliam County, Oregon totaled $10,724,000 in in 2022.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2022 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Smith Family Farms | Condon, OR 97823 | $450,597 |
2 | Pigeon Butte Joint Venture | Arlington, OR 97812 | $237,901 |
3 | Krebs Sheep Company | Ione, OR 97843 | $226,045 |
4 | Tom Rietmann | Condon, OR 97823 | $214,998 |
5 | Weatherford Harper | Ione, OR 97843 | $186,951 |
6 | Munkers Wheat LLC | Arlington, OR 97812 | $181,700 |
7 | Bates Ranches | Condon, OR 97823 | $160,416 |
8 | Froman Farms LLC | Condon, OR 97823 | $150,823 |
9 | Nicholas J & Diane D Welp | Arlington, OR 97812 | $140,975 |
10 | Reser Ranch Inc | Condon, OR 97823 | $138,804 |
11 | Sidney J And Darla K Seale | Condon, OR 97823 | $131,748 |
12 | Potter & Son's Farms | Condon, OR 97823 | $131,320 |
13 | Herbert R Holzapfel | Willows, CA 95988 | $128,666 |
14 | Dustin Hill | Condon, OR 97823 | $113,036 |
15 | John D Burns | Portland, OR 97210 | $109,669 |
16 | Hardie Family General Partnership | Redmond, OR 97756 | $109,504 |
17 | Kamerrer Farms Inc | Condon, OR 97823 | $107,233 |
18 | Robert Jaeger | Condon, OR 97823 | $103,688 |
19 | J S Burres And Sons | Condon, OR 97823 | $100,000 |
20 | Hardie Ranches LLC | Redmond, OR 97756 | $97,292 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>