Farm Subsidy information
Umatilla County, Oregon
Total Subsidies in Umatilla County, Oregon, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,048
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Umatilla County, Oregon totaled $722,683,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Nolin Farming Company | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $14,363,609 |
2 | Hoke Ranches | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $9,004,434 |
3 | Bureau Of Indian Affairs | Winnebago, NE 68071 | $6,268,050 |
4 | Ctuir | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $5,800,574 |
5 | Wkt Farming | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $5,340,467 |
6 | Terjeson Ranches | Helix, OR 97835 | $5,061,052 |
7 | Lht Farming Company | Adams, OR 97810 | $4,781,359 |
8 | Spring Hollow Farming | Athena, OR 97813 | $4,776,480 |
9 | 3s Land Company | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $4,761,611 |
10 | Cunningham Sheep Co | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $4,032,956 |
11 | Eagle Ranch | Echo, OR 97826 | $4,026,077 |
12 | L & T Weidert Farms | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $3,510,295 |
13 | B & B Ranches | Pendleton, OR 97801 | $3,301,447 |
14 | Snow Ranches | Echo, OR 97826 | $3,247,628 |
15 | Cold Springs Ranches | Helix, OR 97835 | $3,235,238 |
16 | Jones & Jones Ranches | Helix, OR 97835 | $3,095,574 |
17 | Eastern Oregon Investment Management | La Grande, OR 97850 | $2,682,956 |
18 | B L Davis Ranch Inc | Adams, OR 97810 | $2,665,297 |
19 | Amstad Farming Company | Sherwood, OR 97140 | $2,594,628 |
20 | Couse Creek Ranches Inc | Scottsdale, AZ 85254 | $2,592,768 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>