Production Flexibility Program in Clinton County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 129
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in Clinton County, Pennsylvania totaled $1,726,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Paul Dotterer & Sons Inc | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $217,948 |
| 2 | Dotterer Farms | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $137,819 |
| 3 | Dunkle And Grieb Farm | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $122,700 |
| 4 | T A Doebler & Son | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $117,948 |
| 5 | Schrack Farms Resources Lp | Loganton, PA 17747 | $114,540 |
| 6 | Alfred B Munro | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $72,941 |
| 7 | Gerald L Seyler | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $62,418 |
| 8 | Blair Courter | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $53,146 |
| 9 | Paul L Courter | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $48,804 |
| 10 | Ronald Meyer | Loganton, PA 17747 | $45,696 |
| 11 | Jacob V Heisey | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $42,064 |
| 12 | James P Webb Jr | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $41,405 |
| 13 | Ramm Farms | Lock Haven, PA 17745 | $37,134 |
| 14 | Roland L Irvin | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $31,700 |
| 15 | Camerer Farms Inc | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $26,135 |
| 16 | Charles L Bechdel | Beech Creek, PA 16822 | $25,844 |
| 17 | Connor Farm | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $25,124 |
| 18 | Robert I Helbley | Lock Haven, PA 17745 | $24,885 |
| 19 | Wehler Farms | Jersey Shore, PA 17740 | $21,946 |
| 20 | Harold Moore | Mill Hall, PA 17751 | $19,509 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf