Emergency Conservation Program in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 54
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania totaled $258,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Robert E Stevens | Benton, PA 17814 | $29,780 |
2 | Zehner Bros | Nescopeck, PA 18635 | $26,203 |
3 | Hazwald Farms | Sugarloaf, PA 18249 | $19,220 |
4 | Wolk's Tree Farm LLC | Drums, PA 18222 | $18,687 |
5 | George J Hubbard | Huntington Mills, PA 18622 | $18,131 |
6 | Jon Lucas | Shickshinny, PA 18655 | $12,435 |
7 | James Doran -incorrect Id Per Dor | Wilkes Barre, PA 18706 | $11,432 |
8 | Albert Kanjorski | Shickshinny, PA 18655 | $9,209 |
9 | Lawrence Omalia | Wilkes Barre, PA 18702 | $7,528 |
10 | Harold O Kessler | Berwick, PA 18603 | $7,130 |
11 | Stanley F Ftorkowski | Shickshinny, PA 18655 | $6,249 |
12 | The Lands At Hillside Farms | Shavertown, PA 18708 | $5,619 |
13 | Michael A Maylath Sr | Sugarloaf, PA 18249 | $5,500 |
14 | Larry Mensinger | Nescopeck, PA 18635 | $5,207 |
15 | James Doran | Hanover Township, PA 18706 | $4,848 |
16 | Wolk's Landscaping Inc | Drums, PA 18222 | $4,000 |
17 | Dymond Farm And Farm Markets | Shavertown, PA 18708 | $3,971 |
18 | Rudolph Chapin | Nescopeck, PA 18635 | $3,925 |
19 | P Larock Sons | Sugarloaf, PA 18249 | $3,776 |
20 | Maylath's Farm Inc | Sugarloaf, PA 18249 | $3,714 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>