Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Wayne County, Pennsylvania, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 183
Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Wayne County, Pennsylvania totaled $556,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Jonas Cold Spring Farm | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $6,237 |
22 | Lawrence J Kerber | Tyler Hill, PA 18469 | $6,202 |
23 | Emil Swingle | Lake Ariel, PA 18436 | $6,032 |
24 | Tri Non Farms | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $6,021 |
25 | James L Hardler | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $5,918 |
26 | Dennis Dillon | Eaton, NY 13334 | $5,682 |
27 | Donald George Eroh | Waymart, PA 18472 | $5,478 |
28 | Jack Chyle | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $5,355 |
29 | Mary Jane Eroh | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $5,227 |
30 | Sally Jonas | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $5,193 |
31 | Elwin Smith | Hawley, PA 18428 | $5,089 |
32 | Ronald E Shemanski | Waymart, PA 18472 | $5,033 |
33 | Daniel Conlogue | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $4,821 |
34 | Kenneth Crum | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $4,798 |
35 | J K Farms | Jarrettsville, MD 21084 | $4,793 |
36 | Martin Paul Medved | Union Dale, PA 18470 | $4,541 |
37 | Andrew W Weist | Honesdale, PA 18431 | $4,415 |
38 | Gilbert Loscig | Starrucca, PA 18462 | $4,236 |
39 | Ronald Sobolak | Milanville, PA 18443 | $4,193 |
40 | Maynard M Douglas | Pleasant Mount, PA 18453 | $4,048 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”