Total Commodity Programs in Kent County, Rhode Island, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Kent County, Rhode Island totaled $640,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Vincent P Confreda | Warwick, RI 02888 | $131,932 |
2 | The Greene Company | Greene, RI 02827 | $112,271 |
3 | Kevin A Breene | West Greenwich, RI 02817 | $83,154 |
4 | Ms Fishing Corp | New Bedford, MA 02740 | $47,306 |
5 | Melissa Jordan | Sterling, CT 06377 | $45,631 |
6 | Melissa Jordan | West Greenwich, RI 02817 | $28,909 |
7 | The Bailey Farm Gen Partnership | East Greenwich, RI 02818 | $28,529 |
8 | Confreda Gardens Inc | Coventry, RI 02816 | $22,149 |
9 | Paul F Bailey | East Greenwich, RI 02818 | $16,222 |
10 | Rodney F Bailey | East Greenwich, RI 02818 | $15,446 |
11 | John P Leyden | West Greenwich, RI 02817 | $15,364 |
12 | Palumbo's Nursery Inc | Warwick, RI 02886 | $14,877 |
13 | Perra Farm | Coventry, RI 02816 | $10,040 |
14 | Peter Fratantuono Jr | Greene, RI 02827 | $7,469 |
15 | West Passage Oyster Company LLC | North Kingstown, RI 02852 | $7,397 |
16 | , | $7,290 | |
17 | Leyden's Tree Farm & Nursery | West Greenwich, RI 02817 | $6,739 |
18 | Bailey Farm Gen Partnership | East Greenwich, RI 02818 | $6,093 |
19 | Jeffrey Mulligan | Warwick, RI 02889 | $4,374 |
20 | Alfred Mulligan | Warwick, RI 02889 | $4,374 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>