Farm Subsidy information

South Carolina

Total Subsidies in South Carolina, 2022

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 3,068

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in South Carolina totaled $165,170,000 in in 2022.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
2022
1Titan Fruit & Vegetable Co IncRidge Spring, SC 29129$1,669,283
2Titan Production Company LLCRidge Spring, SC 29129$1,434,989
3Titan Peach Farms IncRidge Spring, SC 29129$1,415,221
4Jerrold A Watson And Sons, LLCMonetta, SC 29105$975,038
5Carolina Farms & Harvesting IncJohnston, SC 29832$941,855
6Matt Forrest Farms LLCJohnston, SC 29832$900,000
7J W Yonce & Sons IncJohnston, SC 29832$880,818
8J E Cooley Farms IncChesnee, SC 29323$827,801
9C S Mcleod Farms IncMc Bee, SC 29101$780,317
10Jimmy Forrest Farms IncWard, SC 29166$698,735
11Stephen Craig McdowellChesnee, SC 29323$633,035
12Del Valle Fresh Inc ScWoodruff, SC 29388$549,089
13Forrest Fruit Company LLCJohnston, SC 29832$444,962
14Daniel P GauseScranton, SC 29591$442,864
15Arbor One Aca **Florence, SC 29502$436,642
16Ag South Farm Credit Aca **Douglas, GA 31534$380,897
17Joseph H Watson IIMonetta, SC 29105$368,036
18Williams Farms PartnershipIslandton, SC 29929$365,381
19Flowers Farms LLCSummerton, SC 29148$355,765
20Robert E CrosbyEstill, SC 29918$349,710

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag